Now, the New Yorker has gone and pulled the same thing as the New York Times did. Here's the New Yorker story:http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/public-bathroom-regulations-could-create-a-title-ix-crisis …
-
-
-
New Yorker: "These interpretations of federal anti-discrimination law are new and surprising." THIS IS NOT TRUE. NOT AT ALL.
-
It would be great if people could read more than a story on
#HB2 before thinking they should write about transgender issues. -
For people who need the background, here's my thread regarding the NYT's Sunday story on these issues:https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/734467314356244480 …
-
I'm not going through the full thread again, but the federal gov't has been moving on this for years. The courts as well.
-
That Sunday tweetstorm has links to 10 stories, from beginning more than four years ago, about this issue. Please, read before you write.
-
You're right but that would violate the very nature of Twitter. Conclusion jumping is what twitter's all about.
-
If you read the thread, I am discussing articles, in the New Yorker and New York Times.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.