And, I don't know how a NYT story with five writers could be so woefully inadequate, but, this story is:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/22/us/transgender-bathroom-obama-schools.html?_r=1 …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
A story on trans ppl & bathrooms & gov't that doesn't mention the EEOC, 2013 Arcadia settlement, or Grimm case is not actually informed.
3 replies 24 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Those are 3 developments — developments that show this has been going on for some time — that are essential to understanding all of this.
1 reply 13 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
The NYT story also negates the Houston HERO vote to an afterthought, which is another sign that shows this was a poorly informed story.
2 replies 9 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Of course,
@dominicholden and I have been covering all of this, with me covering the EEOC and Arcadia and Dom covering Houston and Grimm.1 reply 8 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
The NYT story is, essentially, a story about a WH meeting. It's a Valerie Jarrett-Chad Griffin story, which explains why it is what it is.
5 replies 10 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
I am confused what you mean here about Jarrett? It just seems like with every issue that is contentious, her name is involved
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I mean the only real new ~fact~ in the story is the April mtg. A Valerie Jarrett meeting @ the White House w LGBT leaders.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.