Of course, the details get much more complicated, so feel free to peruse the briefs at @SCOTUSblog here: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-texas/ …
-
-
Additionally, the House presses on the idea DAPA authorizes "prospective violation of the immigration laws."pic.twitter.com/kQFGCSVAt0
-
In its reply brief, the Obama admin counters the idea that DAPA is conferring the ~right~ to remain in the U.S.:pic.twitter.com/v49lxbqllC
-
The Obama admin specifically argues that "lawful presence" is not the same as "lawful status."pic.twitter.com/WxF0S3qvl6
-
The MALDEF / Jane Does reply brief echoes this "lawful presence" distinction argument:pic.twitter.com/HL4n6uqXMF
-
And, that's a wrap. As noted, please go and look at all the briefs for yourself here — http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-texas/ …
-
For my part, I'll be at
#SCOTUS in the morn for the args, which will follow orders and opinions about 10:15a for about 90 minutes. -
As usual, there will be no electronics in the press gallery during the arguments, so expect the first argument reports about noon.
#SCOTUS - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.