The states' argument, led by Texas, is summed up ~very~ succinctly here:pic.twitter.com/oFVyDf34V4
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The House presses a similar point, arguing that Congress has repeatedly ~refused~ to do what admin did with DAPA:pic.twitter.com/KWWqSOgHK4
Additionally, the House presses on the idea DAPA authorizes "prospective violation of the immigration laws."pic.twitter.com/kQFGCSVAt0
In its reply brief, the Obama admin counters the idea that DAPA is conferring the ~right~ to remain in the U.S.:pic.twitter.com/v49lxbqllC
The Obama admin specifically argues that "lawful presence" is not the same as "lawful status."pic.twitter.com/WxF0S3qvl6
The MALDEF / Jane Does reply brief echoes this "lawful presence" distinction argument:pic.twitter.com/HL4n6uqXMF
And, that's a wrap. As noted, please go and look at all the briefs for yourself here — http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-texas/ …
For my part, I'll be at #SCOTUS in the morn for the args, which will follow orders and opinions about 10:15a for about 90 minutes.
As usual, there will be no electronics in the press gallery during the arguments, so expect the first argument reports about noon. #SCOTUS
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.