Um. They positively cited Thomas' assertion that such laws are 'uncommonly silly.'https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/721112056653615104 …
-
-
Replying to @jawillick
@jawillick Um. Read the thread. I go through the whole thing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner don't follow you and like many others just saw that one rather misleading tweet when it was RT'd into my timeline.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@jawillick Also, if you follow the thread, it's not misleading at all. Thomas was dissenting. He was saying sodomy bans were constitutional.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner yes, but your tweet strongly implies Cruz endorsed the ruling, which he hasn't--even though he hasn't repudiated it either.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jawillick
@jawillick I say he cited positively from Thomas' dissent, which he did, and I LINKED TO THE DAMN ARTICLE. And, I spent an hour explaining.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@jawillick So, if you: 1) read too much into it, 2) can't read the article, and 3) can't read the thread, that seems not to be my fault.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.