Um. They positively cited Thomas' assertion that such laws are 'uncommonly silly.'https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/721112056653615104 …
@jawillick Also, if you follow the thread, it's not misleading at all. Thomas was dissenting. He was saying sodomy bans were constitutional.
-
-
@chrisgeidner yes, but your tweet strongly implies Cruz endorsed the ruling, which he hasn't--even though he hasn't repudiated it either. -
@jawillick I say he cited positively from Thomas' dissent, which he did, and I LINKED TO THE DAMN ARTICLE. And, I spent an hour explaining. -
@jawillick So, if you: 1) read too much into it, 2) can't read the article, and 3) can't read the thread, that seems not to be my fault.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.