Confused by 1st sentence of this @adamliptak @nytimes piece though. Shouldn't it say "must," not "may"?http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/05/us/politics/supreme-court-one-person-one-vote.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0 …
-
-
Replying to @Redistrict
@Redistrict@adamliptak@nytimes No, not at all. The challenge was a request that states should ~have~ to consider voter counts.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@Redistrict The court said they do not ~have~ to consider voter counts. I.E., may consider total pop. My report:http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/supreme-court-says-states-may-continue-to-use-total-populati#.poJQpYGkvZ …1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@Redistrict your story also explains parts of majority opinion said it's required (& Alito disagreed). is it not controlling?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Taniel @Redistrict No, my report says Alito apparently believed majority went too far toward suggesting total population was required.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.