"Won't say" if feds will weigh in on a law that ignores the administration's interpretation of federal law. OK.https://twitter.com/eilperin/status/715235382674198528 …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Here is DOJ's brief against a ~school district~ in Virginia that is ignoring the admin's Title IX interp: http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/obama-administration-supports-transgender-student-in-federal#.uow15Gm0EV …
1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
That brief was filed at the 4th Circuit — of which North Carolina is a part.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Here is the Obama administration's position at the 4th Circuit:pic.twitter.com/sqDo1eR7vu
1 reply 9 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Hard to imagine how that admin doesn't weigh in on a ~state law~ that does the same. ... I def will look at
@PressSec's full remarks.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner maybe by "weigh in" he meant legally?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@jayhawkjack Yes. That is what I am discussing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.