Ridiculous that GA's innocuous RFRA gets vetoed after corps pressure gov, and NC's law actually targeting LGBT goes into law w/o comment.
-
-
Replying to @gabrielmalor
@gabrielmalor I get your point, and there was a massive failure in NC, but I'll leave the first half of your statement to the side for now.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner 25 years of RFRAs, and they've never been used the way gay groups are now saying they'll be used. It's fear-mongering.4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gabrielmalor
@gabrielmalor We've had this debate 20 times, was my point, and I'm not having it again this morning.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@gabrielmalor I mean, you're not completely wrong, but you're also being disingenuous. You don't agree with their position on bakers et al.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@gabrielmalor Fact is, things have changed: (1) new state RFRAs have expansive amendments & (2) SCOTUS has expanded RFRA itself.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.