While talking about Trump's sexism, it implies that the ~only~ thing those senators would bring to the ticket is their sex.
-
-
-
Yes, there might be arguments for increasing the diversity of the ticket by having a male VP, but say that, have that discussion.
-
That would put the discussion on what it actually is about, as opposed to diminishing the role of female senators to their gender.
-
(And what it's actually about is a much more difficult discussion about how restrictive the options for female politicians still are today.)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner you'd think "replacement would be appointed by Rick Snyder" is enough to drop Peters/Stabenow. (WI Gov doesn't appoint)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner who runs the world? Girls carefully watched by men. Pfft.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner Anytime it takes an extended discussion to suss out why you think it's sexist, Trumps simple language wins another voteThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner thoughts on inslee?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner yeah, I was struck by that too (although tbh that kind of crude demographic calculus feels almost standard in VP thinkpieces)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.