-
-
In other words, unless McConnell or Grassley agreed to move Garland, I don't see a rationale for his nomination right now by this POTUS.
-
(And we know that almost certainly did not happen!)
-
Like it or not, and many liberals would go w "not" for good reason, Kelly would be a great nominee—but maybe not for an election year fight.
-
Which leaves us with Srinivasan, the "DC" pick, as I would call him, & Watford, the "liberals" pick, if we had to place them.
#SCOTUS -
This could be Obama's last chance for an out-of-the-ballpark speech about America. I see Watford or Srinivasan being at his side for that.
-
Those are my thoughts. We will see shortly.
#SCOTUS -
So: Garland.
-
Here's my report on the coming Garland nomination:http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/merrick-garland-to-supreme-court#.redKWxK34 …
-
A possibility not included in my earlier thoughts: If Srinivasan and Watford said no to a nomination fight now. They're both under 50.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner are you preparing us for a Geidner nomination? -
Tweet unavailable
-
@pnuts_mama You reply to a lot of my tweets with "Adam." I must be doing something right! -
@asmith83@pnuts_mama I get mostly
s
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner @HebertofNH Maybe GOP signed on forseeing Trump's appointment of one of the Duck Dynasty Guys?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner Would be reverting back to his negotiation strategy in 2011 of bargaining against himselfThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner @jesseberney The left always negotiates with the GOP. The reverse no longer happens. Trump is the result. They want it all.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.