Yes, there was _some_ partisanship in his focus on the Dems' filibuster rule change and not the GOP intransigence that preceded it.
-
-
-
But he also attacked his side: "I’ll be fighting talk radio when somebody on my side puts up a nutjob—& they will." http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/lindsey-graham-warns-of-consequences-if-gop-blocks-obama-cou#.wczPpyEKR5 …
-
Graham laid out how the end of the filibuster for lower court nominees eliminated the need to consult the other party on nominations.
-
He talked about how _that_ means it's the extremes of each caucus "dar[ing] somebody in the conference to vote against that person."
-
And, finally, Graham warned the same rule change is inevitably going to come for Supreme Court nominees — a development he would "hate."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner@GrahamBlog I voted for the Pres for 4 not 3 years, so don't leave to voters because we already spoke thru our previous votesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner I like the last line zinger against the House. ;)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner@boerneaj@GrahamBlog He is such a snobThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.