@imillhiser Right, and I'm saying the "Consistent with" language needn't be a slap; it also could be a way for the court to say they ...
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@imillhiser ... aren't giving consideration at this time to the small distinctions between the laws (which the 5th Cir obvs did).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@imillhiser And, by doing so, they could move it forward and the Chief and Alito didn't need to note dissent. (Think of marriage stays.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@imillhiser Esp. given that the Chief and Alito knew the vote in Whole Woman's it might just be that they know they lost this fight for now.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@imillhiser And, dissenting to the order to vacate, when they know the vote in Whole Woman's, just felt futile to them.
5:47 AM - 7 Mar 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.