@imillhiser ... aren't giving consideration at this time to the small distinctions between the laws (which the 5th Cir obvs did).
@imillhiser Right, and I'm saying the "Consistent with" language needn't be a slap; it also could be a way for the court to say they ...
-
-
-
@imillhiser And, by doing so, they could move it forward and the Chief and Alito didn't need to note dissent. (Think of marriage stays.) -
@imillhiser Esp. given that the Chief and Alito knew the vote in Whole Woman's it might just be that they know they lost this fight for now. -
@imillhiser And, dissenting to the order to vacate, when they know the vote in Whole Woman's, just felt futile to them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.