@chrisgeidner @Patterico Maybe a better analogy would be third-party subpoenas?
-
-
Replying to @gabrielmalor
@gabrielmalor@chrisgeidner Which is an analogy I used as well. Hillary analogy was admittedly for an emotional punch.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Patterico
@Patterico@gabrielmalor I honestly don't know coding well enough to know whether the burden issue is as light as you state it as. If so ...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@Patterico@gabrielmalor ... then it's not likely an undue burden and they'll be ordered to do so under NY Telephone Co.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@Patterico@gabrielmalor One of my big concerns, again beyond my technical know-how, is what, via remote access, the government might be ...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@Patterico@gabrielmalor ... able to figure out the code changes implemented by Apple, if the gov't is trying to find a way around Apple.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@Patterico The issue isn't really whether someone else can write the code.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gabrielmalor
@chrisgeidner@Patterico It's whether Apple's proprietary access signature for the update will be replicable. (It won't.)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gabrielmalor
@chrisgeidner@Patterico Right? FBI needs Apple bc only Apple has the valid access signature to update the firmware.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gabrielmalor
@gabrielmalor@Patterico Then why isn't that what they're compelling? They're compelling that by implication, by compelling Apple to do ...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@gabrielmalor @Patterico ... the nec changes to the iOS, right?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.