@MattBruenig @rtraister Except he was irrelevant on the national stage when stuff like this was going on: http://www.nytimes.com/1992/10/11/magazine/gay-politics-goes-mainstream.html?pagewanted=all …
-
-
Replying to @thegarance
@thegarance Nearly 25 years later and some things haven’t changed all that much.pic.twitter.com/laMDOsnx4m
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @jamisonfoser
@jamisonfoser@thegarance My question is: Point me to a time when he ~led~ on LGBT rights, as opposed to "voted the right way."3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@thegarance Zero times, afaik. But I’m also in the ever-shrinking minority that remembers DADT as (incomplete & ugly) progress2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jamisonfoser
@jamisonfoser@thegarance I've regularly distinguished DADT from DOMA. They are very different situations.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@jamisonfoser @thegarance In substance and certainly in terms of the Clintons.
10:05 PM - 19 Jan 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.