@theglipper The fact that US is w Heffernan here seems ... notable.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner motive but then tried to escape liability on technicality. Didn't work for D in that case; don't think it will work here1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @theglipper
@theglipper I ~think~ you're right. Again: Notable U.S. went against the city here.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@theglipper But: I do think the parade of horrible a by Paterson is a tooth-and-nails attempt to get an extra vote or two.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner 8-1, with NJ native Samuel Alito ruling for the city
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @theglipper
@theglipper Oh! You should definitely check out the Becket Fund amicus in support of Hefffernan. Talks about collective expression of rts.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner Every now and again I'm on the same side as them
also, interesting that Tom Goldsein arguing for City1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner Just skimmed the Becket Fund brief. Methinks they are trying to set up a new 1st Am hook to battle discrimination claims.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@theglipper Shhhhhh! I told you to read it, not to talk about it. ;-)
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner Fear not, I wasn't talking out loud!0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.