Tomorrow's First Amendment patronage case at #SCOTUS — http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/heffernan-v-paterson/ … — could be a doozy.
@theglipper The fact that US is w Heffernan here seems ... notable.
-
-
@chrisgeidner motive but then tried to escape liability on technicality. Didn't work for D in that case; don't think it will work here -
@theglipper I ~think~ you're right. Again: Notable U.S. went against the city here. -
@theglipper But: I do think the parade of horrible a by Paterson is a tooth-and-nails attempt to get an extra vote or two. -
@chrisgeidner 8-1, with NJ native Samuel Alito ruling for the city
-
@theglipper Oh! You should definitely check out the Becket Fund amicus in support of Hefffernan. Talks about collective expression of rts. -
@theglipper I just read through the contents, but it seemed really interesting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner this case kind of feels like EEOC v Abercrombie from last term; in both cases, defendant acted w admittedly impermissible…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.