Today I learned a lot people think LGBT discrimination is already banned federally. Memo to USA: Nope.
-
-
Replying to @dominicholden
.
@dominicholden It is, but as sex discrimination. However, you are correct re: explicit SO and GI protections.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dominicholden
@dominicholden Fair point, but it's been immeasurably helpful, particularly given the absence of explicit protections.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iantDC
@iantDC@dominicholden It is a federal ban, through "sex," as per the EEOC, which has authority to investigate and conciliate such claims.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@dominicholden That's also true for HUD re: the Fair Housing Act and ED re: Title IX, etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iantDC
@iantDC@dominicholden Yup. Just because an agency's position hasn't been affirmed by the courts doesn't mean it's not a national policy.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@iantDC I’m familiar with what EEOC has said. But is that a national policy for public accommodation and private housing?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dominicholden
@dominicholden@iantDC That was ~not~ your initial statement. Not by a long shot.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner And this increasingly narrow interpretation isn’t quite what@iantDC said either. Not by a long shot.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@dominicholden @iantDC And I made neither statement!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.