I'm reading the Sander/Taylor "mismatch" Fisher amicus brief tonight, because I'm wild and crazy.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
The "learning mismatch" example = :-( "Learning" in a law school classroom is measured by bar passage rates.pic.twitter.com/GaxXaZAKJT
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
The "competition mismatch" section, meanwhile, is the graf that apparently informed Scalia's comments at arguments:pic.twitter.com/HyuvwbA1CH
5 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
From earlier, here are the two pro-mismatch theory briefs filed in Fisher: http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs_2015_2016/14-981_amicus_np_sander.authcheckdam.pdf … / http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/14-981-tsac-Gail-Heriot-et-al.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
And, the anti-mismatch theory brief filed in Fisher: http://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/fisher_amicus_final_8-13-12_0.pdf?m=1381701331 … ("mismatch research should not pass the core Daubert tests")
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.