I'm reading the Sander/Taylor "mismatch" Fisher amicus brief tonight, because I'm wild and crazy.
-
-
From earlier, here are the two pro-mismatch theory briefs filed in Fisher: http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs_2015_2016/14-981_amicus_np_sander.authcheckdam.pdf … / http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/14-981-tsac-Gail-Heriot-et-al.pdf …
-
And, the anti-mismatch theory brief filed in Fisher: http://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/fisher_amicus_final_8-13-12_0.pdf?m=1381701331 … ("mismatch research should not pass the core Daubert tests")
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner these are factual questions, right?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner Agree with@kdrum that Scalia's infelicitous description of these studies is kinda weird. He's normally sharper.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner as others note, "competition mismatch" could and does apply to various groups including rich people who go to prestige schools -
@chrisgeidner I'd be interested to know if there are factors that allow various people to adapt but others (such as newbie blacks) to not -
@chrisgeidner thus it might be a crafting issue
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.