A week ago, on Nov. 9, @cspan highlighted Korematsu v. U.S. in its #LandmarkCases series: http://www.c-span.org/video/?327715-1/supreme-court-landmark-case-korematsu-v-united-states …
-
-
Justice Frank Murphy: The exclusion "goes over 'the very brink of constitutional power,' and falls into the ugly abyss of racism."
-
Justice Owen Roberts: "I dissent, because I think the indisputable facts exhibit a clear violation of Constitutional rights."
-
Justice Robert H. Jackson, dissenting: "if any fundamental assumption underlies our system, it is that guilt is personal & not inheritable."
-
More Jackson: "I do not think [the courts] may be asked to execute a military expedient that has no place in law under the Constitution."
-
Finally, from the Korematsu majority opinion by Justice Hugo Black: "But hardships are part of war ..."pic.twitter.com/lNMh9uWEbt
-
Black, upholding internment camps: "All citizens alike, both in and out of uniform, feel the impact of war in greater or lesser measure."
-
Justice Felix Frankfurter concurred, saying the decision "does not carry with it approval of that which Congress and the Executive did."
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner Circumstances of his pre-arrest behavior interesting also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Korematsu … -
@elizabeth_joh Yup. To be clear, re-reading. Not "reading" for the first time. -
@chrisgeidner Course. Just meant that few mention the "passing" part of the story. Fascinating and weird. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner if that's not enough reading, may I also suggest this?https://twitter.com/kiyash/status/666130791886229504 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.