@chrisgeidner @joshrogersNHPR she has always supported it I believe.
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner@joshrogersNHPR so odd to me that's "she's running" since it's always been -
@Aubs89@joshrogersNHPR I'm just stating her position in this campaign. -
@Aubs89@joshrogersNHPR She "reaffirmed her support for the death penalty" would probably be a better wording. -
@chrisgeidner@Aubs89@joshrogersNHPR Yes, your wording is misleading and deceptive. -
@GopSux2@Aubs89@joshrogersNHPR No, it's neither. Her position in the 2016 campaign is to support, not oppose, the death penalty. -
@chrisgeidner@Aubs89@joshrogersNHPR How does that now become a campaign bullet point? - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner wouldn't really say that's completely "supportive"? -
@IAMDANIELBARR You either support its use or oppose it. She supports it. -
@chrisgeidner there can be an in between. I think it should be rare but used when completely necessary. -
@IAMDANIELBARR "used when completely necessary" is a rhetorical phrasing, not a legal one. -
@chrisgeidner lol ok Chris, ok. -
@IAMDANIELBARR "completely necessary" is just false. You may support it in rare instances, but there is no situation in which it is ... -
@IAMDANIELBARR ... completely necessary. I don't even know what that would mean. It's like, a description of self-defense, not execution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.