I skipped ahead, just like the movie did, and skipped the first arguments, but, omg, there were THREE DAYS of args here, including rearg!
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Donovan is so damn good at points in this. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1959/2 pic.twitter.com/4WtNm5JwaV
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Because, of course the SG would cite approvingly to the Alien & Sedition Acts ...pic.twitter.com/90ouNK5l4Q
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
The court's 5-4 decision, by Frankfurter, upholding the search's validity:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/362/217/case.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Douglas, J., dissenting!pic.twitter.com/DPf0I4zHYU
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
More from Justice Douglas's dissent: "The question is how far zeal may be permitted to carry officials bent on law enforcement."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
From Brennan's dissent, which actually was the lead dissent for all 4 of them (incl CJ Warren, Douglas, White):pic.twitter.com/o2C8oUxoJk
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner this is an oddly engaging stream to follow at 3.44 am.1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
@singareddynm I blame Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg!
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner I need you to break down all SCOTUS-related films please and thank you.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.