The entire article is about a focus on trans issues, but the whole thing is cabined as "gay rights," under NYT's anachronistic style guide.
-
-
-
Trans issues are a key next front for LGBT issues, true. Repeatedly then using "gay rights" as shorthand(?) for LGBT rights is nonsensical.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner@amychozick@nytimes Their stance on gender-neutral pronouns is pretty awful too. -
@_joannaw Yeah, we've been through that one a few times on here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No,
@nytimes, trans* rights are not the next front in gay rights. They are a current front in equal rights.@chrisgeidner@amychozick - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner@amychozick@nytimes@miller_stephen honest question: what's the issue? gay rights vs lgbt rights? -
@MathewKatz@chrisgeidner@amychozick@nytimes yes, trans does not fall under the umbrella of gayhttps://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/650725791827894272 … -
@miller_stephen@chrisgeidner@amychozick@nytimes got it, thank you -
@MathewKatz From ur insight, will future Time articles 'get it' re: social (& scientific) error of thinking LGBT issues are interchangeable?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.