@gracels Did you even read the report, let alone the motion?
@gracels Of course she's going to lose on the merits. And, it's not on class cert; it's on this "clarification" that Bunning issued.
-
-
@gracels I think the 6th Circuit could go either way on it. From the one side: "At the end of the day, she's wrong wrong wrong. So, stop." -
@gracels On the other side: "If you're going to be throwing people in jail for contempt, we're going to make sure your orders are clear." -
@chrisgeidner But Bunning’s contempt citation is not tainted by any confusion over the “clarification” is it? -
@gracels Yeah, it is -- at least as to the order in which he released her. Her release is contingent on not violating the clarified order. -
@chrisgeidner To reverse clarified order would procedural nightmare for both trial and appellate court. Not seeing that scenario.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner The courts are getting tangled up in the mess of filings. Hopefully the Sixth panel will cut through the knot.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.