@smmarotta @chrisgeidner AMK didn’t refer to full court after Hollingsworth http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/12-144.htm … 6/30
-
-
Replying to @JoshMBlackman
@JoshMBlackman@smmarotta And, Alito did not refer the Schuylkill County Orphans’ Court Clerk's request to the full court, either.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@JoshMBlackman You imagine that Liberty Counsel would just renew the denied application under Rule 22.4, but who knows.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @smmarotta
@smmarotta@chrisgeidner Yeah, I suspect the prudent J Kagan will refer to whole court, but there is precedent not to with Kennedy and Alito1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoshMBlackman
@JoshMBlackman@smmarotta Yeah, my only thought for why she might not is that, in that case, she is likely to issue a temp stay, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@smmarotta If she calls for a response, it acts as a temporary stay.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoshMBlackman
@JoshMBlackman@smmarotta Isn't that separate? Wouldn't it need to say so explicitly?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@smmarotta As I understand it, the act of calling for the response puts it on hold, briefly1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JoshMBlackman
@JoshMBlackman@chrisgeidner@smmarotta If brief stay automatic, why explicit language in McDonnell order?pic.twitter.com/7O5BnTiuxW
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KimberlyRobinsn
@KimberlyRobinsn@chrisgeidner@smmarotta It isn’t automatic, but if Court calls for response, no point letting judgment go into effect1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@JoshMBlackman @KimberlyRobinsn @smmarotta So, it doesn't "act as a temp stay"; it would need to include a stay as well, which was my pt.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.