Has anyone written anything about how 47 U.S.C. 230 is going to interact with this Rentboy prosecution yet?
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner That may explain the emphasis on money changing hands and Rentboy's approval of all content in the complaint.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SShackford
@SShackford But money can change hands for ISPs and approval of all content suggests that there likely were (?) people they kicked or ...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@SShackford ... suspended for violating the terms of service.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner That might explain why she detailed specific ads in the complaint. We don't know if they were still up as of this morning.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SShackford
@SShackford Did any of the cited ads offer sex for money? I don't believe so.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner True. She cross-referenced the review site instead, which could give Rentboy an out ... if jurors believe it.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SShackford
@SShackford I definitely feel like the review site — and any proof that Rentboy was engaging with them — is going to be key.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner And with seven defendants they can lean on the most vulnerable (work visa you say?) with mercy to say they knew.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@SShackford Definitely found the bringing in of all the employees at the same time to be a bit strange.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.