NYT: Where Clicks Reign, Audience Is King http://nyti.ms/1MsM620 / I think so many negative things about this article—but am not surprised.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner I think it's on point actually. The number of outlets keeps growing while the number of talked-about stories seems to shrink.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KatzOnEarth
@KatzOnEarth I obv totally disagree. Cecil coverage helps pay for our coverage of trans murders, which others aren't covering nationally.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@KatzOnEarth "News of the weird" was always covered — and pays for other coverage. If you see BuzzFeed for "the dress," you're ignoring ...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@KatzOnEarth ... the coverage that others are working on that is totally undercovered. (And, just using BF as a random example there.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner BuzzFeed does tremendous journalism. I have respect and envy for you guys. (BF also wasn't mentioned in the piece.)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@KatzOnEarth Right, I was totally just using it as an example of the dreaded ~online journalism~
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.