It's like a rewrite of every article by an entity w/ a vested interested in shitting on online journalism ever. Also: Still distinguishing?
-
-
-
I think I'm going to watch a color television tonight. (Actually, not. I'll watch Amazon, streaming
#TheGoodWife, on my laptop.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner I think it's on point actually. The number of outlets keeps growing while the number of talked-about stories seems to shrink. -
@KatzOnEarth I obv totally disagree. Cecil coverage helps pay for our coverage of trans murders, which others aren't covering nationally. -
@KatzOnEarth "News of the weird" was always covered — and pays for other coverage. If you see BuzzFeed for "the dress," you're ignoring ... -
@KatzOnEarth ... the coverage that others are working on that is totally undercovered. (And, just using BF as a random example there.) -
@chrisgeidner BuzzFeed does tremendous journalism. I have respect and envy for you guys. (BF also wasn't mentioned in the piece.) -
@KatzOnEarth Right, I was totally just using it as an example of the dreaded ~online journalism~
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@chrisgeidner What a "considered" article, we're all supposed to say.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.