@chrisgeidner 3 amendts:
1 (gift shop): http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d114:56:./temp/~bd1WbJ::|/home/LegislativeData.php …|
2 (grave): http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d114:62:./temp/~bd1WbJ::|/home/LegislativeData.php …|
3 (any display): http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d114:76:./temp/~bd1WbJ::|/home/LegislativeData.php …|
@nycsouthpaw "sponsoring group" makes it seem a bit more formal to me. also, the "don't have to stop" could have been worded that way, yes?
-
-
@nycsouthpaw BTW, "legislative amber" came from somewhere else, right? Because, if that's new from you, trademark it. -
@chrisgeidner hah I'm sure I stole it from somewhere. (although I did rent Jurassic Park the other day)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner well anyway, let's enshrine this ambiguity in federal law!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.