@chrisgeidner barring it from nps cemeteries is pretty clearly unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, I'd think
-
-
Replying to @nycsouthpaw
@nycsouthpaw "... ban the use of federal funds for displaying the Confederate flag on federal lands." I've not seen the actual language.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@nycsouthpaw So, looks like Spending Clause stuff somehow.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner oh gotcha, so taxpayers have been paying to decorate graves w flags of the rebellion. jeez.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @nycsouthpaw
@nycsouthpaw I've not done research in accord with my usual pre-pontificating investigation, so I ~prolly~ shouldn't be opining.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner 3 amendts: 1 (gift shop): http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d114:56:./temp/~bd1WbJ::|/home/LegislativeData.php …| 2 (grave): http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d114:62:./temp/~bd1WbJ::|/home/LegislativeData.php …| 3 (any display): http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d114:76:./temp/~bd1WbJ::|/home/LegislativeData.php …|1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nycsouthpaw
@nycsouthpaw Sending me to "National Park Service Director's Order 61," Pup. This is now something Toby does on a West Wing episode.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@nycsouthpaw So, here's the order -->pic.twitter.com/e1KcziTx01
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@nycsouthpaw The amendment, though, goes beyond Spending Clause, doesn't it?pic.twitter.com/Epk8afOsee
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner query whether the amendment also forbids spending funds to remove the flags as soon as possible1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@nycsouthpaw That as well.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.