Crap like this from @EdWhelanEPPC is why presumptive "inside-the-mind-of-RBG" pieces like @NYTimesDowd's are no good:http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/418528/more-injudicious-ginsburg-ed-whelan …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Like, of course
@EdWhelanEPPC knows that@NYTimesDowd has no clue what was inside Justice Ginsburg's mind. But, he gets a good NRO piece ...3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
.
@chrisgeidner So your problem is that@EdWhelanEPPC wrote something based on@NYTimesDowd , not that Dowd speculated what RBG was thinking?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DraftRyan2016
@DraftRyan2016@EdWhelanEPPC@NYTimesDowd Both!!!3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner oh. Bc your original tweet says that the "crap like"@EdWhelanEPPC piece is *the* reason the@NYTimesDowd piece is no good1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DraftRyan2016
@chrisgeidner sounded like your issue was with@EdWhelanEPPC piece & not@NYTimesDowd1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DraftRyan2016
@DraftRyan2016@EdWhelanEPPC@NYTimesDowd Her opinion stuff in there was pointless; it is nefarious of Whelan to pretend it's fact.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@DraftRyan2016@EdWhelanEPPC@NYTimesDowd heh. nefarious. simmer down, hoss.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MZHemingway
@MZHemingway@DraftRyan2016@EdWhelanEPPC@NYTimesDowd Yes, intentional misuse of a dumb column's claim to pretend that something is fact.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MZHemingway @DraftRyan2016 @EdWhelanEPPC @NYTimesDowd ... in an attempt to undercut the authority of the Supreme Court.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.