Honestly, totally confused by all of this. The campaign's focus on the debate between "Clinton's lawyer" v. "Team Clinton" seems like ...
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
... an attempt to create a distinction that just isn't there.
1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
It also was like, this totally different tone than they gave to
@jeneps.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
And, if
@brianefallon or@marceelias want to share their retention agreement with me to see how conflicts are handled, I'd love to see it!2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner This is absurd. Both@brianefallon +@marceelias denied it was specifically a Clinton case+no atty owes further.@armandodkos2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bmaz
@bmaz@brianefallon@marceelias@armandodkos The only person to say anything like that was Fallon, who said "Team Clinton" was not a party.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@bmaz@brianefallon@marceelias@armandodkos He used "Team Clinton," apparently, as Clinton campaign, whereas I meant "pro-Clinton players."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@bmaz@brianefallon@marceelias@armandodkos Elias has implied things, but never said anything directly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Chris Geidner Retweeted Rick Hasen
@bmaz@brianefallon@marceelias@armandodkos And neither responded to this (after both had been eagerly tweeting):https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/597907056054538240 …Chris Geidner added,
4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@brianefallon@marceelias@armandodkos I love you, but this is one of the most silly arguments imaginable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@bmaz @brianefallon @marceelias @armandodkos I wholly concur, as I just tweeted.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.