I mean, I'd like to write about a hundred things about Obergefell, Glossip, and Williams-Yulee. #SCOTUS
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
To start: Yes, the Chief's sex discrim question yesterday was interesting. It's not a new thought, not by a long shot, but it could ...
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
... give him a way to write a concurrence to Kennedy's majority opinion that would allow him to distinguish his Windsor vote. And while ...
4 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
... that sounds crazy, it's pretty much exactly what O'Connor did from Bowers to Lawrence.
4 replies 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner I would think he would have pursued the question further if that was his plan.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nharpermn
@chrisgeidner The only on-point SCOTUS case on that was Baker v. Nelson, which was a summary dismissal, so it's underdeveloped to begin w/.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nharpermn
@nharpermn I mean, perhaps you don't know this, but I am very well aware.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner Sorry, I figured you did. I just view it being a single question as a cut against that happening, rather than likely.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@nharpermn Agree it wasn't his big plan. But, assuming he sees AMK vote yes at conf, it's hard to decide to dissent into history.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner I see your point now. Legally, it's an odd move, but for political/historical posturing, it's a smart one.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.