I mean, I'd like to write about a hundred things about Obergefell, Glossip, and Williams-Yulee. #SCOTUS
-
-
... that sounds crazy, it's pretty much exactly what O'Connor did from Bowers to Lawrence.
-
@chrisgeidner I would think he would have pursued the question further if that was his plan. -
@chrisgeidner The only on-point SCOTUS case on that was Baker v. Nelson, which was a summary dismissal, so it's underdeveloped to begin w/. -
@nharpermn I mean, perhaps you don't know this, but I am very well aware. -
@chrisgeidner Sorry, I figured you did. I just view it being a single question as a cut against that happening, rather than likely. -
@nharpermn Agree it wasn't his big plan. But, assuming he sees AMK vote yes at conf, it's hard to decide to dissent into history. -
@chrisgeidner I see your point now. Legally, it's an odd move, but for political/historical posturing, it's a smart one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner interesting, but wouldn't the sex discrimination argument have applied with equal force in Windsor though?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner Was sex disc argued in Windsor?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.