It seems very unlikely that the AL Supr Ct would issue an order preemptively providing exemptions to its current order based on cases ...
-
-
-
… that do not directly involve Alabama's marriage laws. Based on our experience in Alabama thus far, it'll take a federal court order.
-
That said, it sounds like Judge
@stevenlouisreed is pretty much just making *his* position clear here:pic.twitter.com/euMCpXkFPx
-
And, just a bit, it looks like Montgomery Probate Judge
@stevenlouisreed is trolling the Alabama Supreme Court:pic.twitter.com/0ooOc9GHea
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner I like this@stevenlouisreed. He's got sand. -
@nycsouthpaw@stevenlouisreed I mean, I get what he's doing, politically. Legally, I'm wondering if it's a set-up move for later. -
@chrisgeidner@stevenlouisreed legally it's headed for a quick denial and a filing cabinet, no? -
@nycsouthpaw@stevenlouisreed Oh, yes. But, then he has a state supreme court order, and you know to whom those are appealed. -
@chrisgeidner@stevenlouisreed ah, that would be a SCOTUS case with extraordinarily broad implications. are there 4 justices who want that? -
@nycsouthpaw@stevenlouisreed I think if the Alabama Supreme Court, after June, plays rough, this gives them an in if they need it. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner@stevenlouisreed Judge Reed, you are a wise man. Good to see a jurist who favors rule of law over politics.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.