Every piece like this totally ignores the reasoning of Loving v Virginia and Brown v Board like they don't exist. http://townhall.com/columnists/frankturek/2015/03/17/why-the-14th-amendment-cant-possibly-require-samesex-marriage-n1971423 …
@JoeDunman Also: Didn't the history brief in Lawrence prove the history he posits here wrong?
-
-
@chrisgeidner Almost nothing he posits is correct. It reads like it was written by a high school sophomore who falls asleep in class a lot.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.