@nycsouthpaw I just can’t get over the “free speech” can be “hate speech” part
-
-
Replying to @oliverdarcy
@oliverdarcy@nycsouthpaw Also: The last scenario is like a lawyer's plaything.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@oliverdarcy@nycsouthpaw There are at least six words or phrases in that provision that could be subject to litigation.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@oliverdarcy@nycsouthpaw "student lobby space" and "solution" are a stretch, but at least four really good ones.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@oliverdarcy I'd like to see them explain what "a considerable request to do so" means1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nycsouthpaw
@nycsouthpaw@oliverdarcy That was my favorite, although "issues arise" is like Model Not-Code language.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@nycsouthpaw@oliverdarcy The debates over what is and what is not a "decorative item" clearly would be the best part of this, of course.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@oliverdarcy someone should walk in there wearing a pair of these and see what happenspic.twitter.com/pP9m6uv6ks
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
@oliverdarcy @nycsouthpaw It's UCI. What about ... just to up our price on the movie rights?pic.twitter.com/ILAlHw0EIq
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.