@chrisgeidner I appreciate the reductio ad absurdum but my point wasn't about the specifics of the situation. It's about where time is spent
-
-
Replying to @LukasThoms
@LukasThoms You said it, not me, Lukas. "if your goal is to actually make a change in the world, then yes, focus is required" <-- You ...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@LukasThoms … either were suggesting one cannot do both OR you were simply stating a truism & both can take place, in which case I don't ...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@LukasThoms … know what your point of bringing it up was.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner not that you can't do both, but that you're more effective if you double your efforts on one1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LukasThoms
@LukasThoms If Ira hadn't written about Graham Moore, maybe Asa Hutchinson would have vetoed SB 202?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner not necessarily, but more people would've been aware of a larger injustice, yes1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LukasThoms
@chrisgeidner the argument for writing about moore and writing about hutchinson are exactly the same, so which one do you choose?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LukasThoms
@LukasThoms … whichever you pick, do it quick, cuz you're starting to stick, to the steps of the palace.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
@LukasThoms I mean, but seriously, by that logic, I should stop writing about LGBT people and report on Chinese human rights abuses.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.