imagine a world where all the energy spent scolding moore and arquette was instead spent on this: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/23/1366340/-Arkansas-bill-targeting-LGBT-Americans-for-discrimination-poised-to-become-law …
@LukasThoms @Aubs89 @kerryeleveld I say that, bc you're smarter than that and you do many things. It's laughable for you to say that.
-
-
@chrisgeidner@Aubs89@kerryeleveld this isn't a debate for twitter, but i don't appreciate the condescension -
@LukasThoms It was a ridiculous statement. Come off it. People can't criticize Oscars' happenings if they want to stop anti-LGBT laws?! -
@chrisgeidner I appreciate the reductio ad absurdum but my point wasn't about the specifics of the situation. It's about where time is spent -
@LukasThoms You said it, not me, Lukas. "if your goal is to actually make a change in the world, then yes, focus is required" <-- You ... -
@LukasThoms … either were suggesting one cannot do both OR you were simply stating a truism & both can take place, in which case I don't ... -
@LukasThoms … know what your point of bringing it up was. -
@chrisgeidner not that you can't do both, but that you're more effective if you double your efforts on one -
@LukasThoms If Ira hadn't written about Graham Moore, maybe Asa Hutchinson would have vetoed SB 202? - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.