.@chrisgeidner @emilybazelon She's making valid points that are worth thinking about. Particularly for the (vast majority) of the laity.
-
-
@CharlesPulliam@emilybazelon The piece ignores countervailing evidence from the judge herself and from other states. Moore is outlier. -
@CharlesPulliam@emilybazelon B/c some activists (& NYT reports) have been overstating what Moore has done doesn't mean Bazelon is right. -
@chrisgeidner@emilybazelon Meant not to justify, but rather provide a brief explanation of one of the case's central curios. -
@CharlesPulliam@emilybazelon I'm aware of what it is meant to do, and I think it fails at that by ignoring several relevant points.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner@emilybazelon Again, you're assigning too much weight to a thrust that the piece simply doesn't have. -
@CharlesPulliam@emilybazelon I think you're defending this to be contrarian, but you be you. -
@chrisgeidner@emilybazelon ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ it's not even that heavy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.