Oooooops, no one told @emilybazelon she wasn't writing for #slatepitches here. http://nyti.ms/1A1v9Vq
@CharlesPulliam @emilybazelon … state officials' decision not to appeal district court decisions.
-
-
@CharlesPulliam@emilybazelon Finally, I'm not sure how Bazelon discusses how Alabama "is different," without talking about Florida. -
@chrisgeidner@emilybazelon If the piece were meant to be a sweeping excuse of Moore's actions, then I might be more inclined to side w/you. -
@CharlesPulliam@emilybazelon So, a piece can ignore multiple very relevant details as long as it says "sort-of" in the headline? Nope. -
@CharlesPulliam@emilybazelon The piece ignores countervailing evidence from the judge herself and from other states. Moore is outlier. -
@CharlesPulliam@emilybazelon B/c some activists (& NYT reports) have been overstating what Moore has done doesn't mean Bazelon is right. -
@chrisgeidner@emilybazelon Meant not to justify, but rather provide a brief explanation of one of the case's central curios. -
@CharlesPulliam@emilybazelon I'm aware of what it is meant to do, and I think it fails at that by ignoring several relevant points.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.