J. Scalia was vexed by TX arg that only 1968 FHA and not 1988 amendments should be considered when deciding if disparate impact is allowed.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
I think we could be surprised by the decision in today's case. Focus was on the balancing test, largely, when Inclusive Comms & SG spoke.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
Interestingly, the test was the second proposed question presented in the case -- which the court did not accept.
8:29 AM - 21 Jan 2015
0 replies
1 retweet
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.