@chrisgeidner Clarification: if SCOTUS rules for us, marriage in all 50. If SCOTUS against us... nothing changes in states where it's legal?
-
-
Replying to @fakedansavage
@fakedansavage Sorry, missed this in the stream yesterday! It looks like it was answered. It's also discussed here: http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/the-supreme-court-has-been-preparing-the-country-for-marriag …2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner Could#SCOTUS split on the 2 q's? Force states to recognize other states' SSMs, but not perform own SSMs?@fakedansavage1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @CDMatthewMurphy
@CDMatthewMurphy @fakedansavage Of course they *could*, but I directly address that in the link provided.
8:22 PM - 17 Jan 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.