@BroderickGreer But, seriously, it left the only real issue here unaddressed in the story. Right?
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner I think it is clear he is attracted to men and not to women but is married to a woman because he'd go to hell for loving a man1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BroderickGreer
@BroderickGreer But it suggests he *is* attracted to her, at least somewhat and in some ways.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner that's evangelical code for they had sex even though he isn't attracted to women.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BroderickGreer
@BroderickGreer Fair. He can use "magic words." A reporter shouldn't.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@BroderickGreer gotta disagree that it's just evangelical code. I know plenty of people who have had similar experiences1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanielleVEsq
@DVanLierEsq
@BroderickGreer It can be both code *and* something that does actually happen. Again, tho, the article shouldn't make us guess.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@BroderickGreer it seemed pretty clear to me- he's attracted to men, but fell in love w/a woman. Are the labels rly important?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleVEsq
@DVanLierEsq
@BroderickGreer That's not what he says and it's not what the story says.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@BroderickGreer his story runs very close to a few I know very well. The subtext of his comments is very familiar.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DVanLierEsq @BroderickGreer Again: Subtext. That's my point.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.