That is ... interesting.
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner why is it interesting? -
@ZachWahls Have you ever seen a lawyer in one of these cases *not* take the opportunity to have the last word on the merits arguments? -
@chrisgeidner don't enough about the technical aspects to sufficiently say, tbh -
@ZachWahls More generally: Have you ever seen a lawyer not want to have the last word to a judge? -
@ZachWahls It's very interesting. There could be several reasons for it, but they're all interesting and a sign of how quickly things ...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@nycsouthpaw Did you see this?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner for those into the technical details, this might be of interest -- http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2015/01/the-process-of-marriage-equality-redux.html#more … -
@JoePaulson2 This is about the merits of the marriage case itself, not a side issue about the injunction's scope. -
@JoePaulson2 I was just making sure you saw what the filing I tweeted about was referring to! -
@chrisgeidner thanks :) saw a flag about it at SCOTUSBLOG -
@JoePaulson2 And, I don't disagree with that post on the side-issue. I more concisely wrote the same here: http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/florida-judge-says-constitution-requires-same-sex-marriages#.ckNZ92PlbV … ;-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.