So, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, and South Carolina all are states with marriage equality in some sense -- but rank ordering them is unclear.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
In some ways, MT is the 1st of the 4 states, if defined as the first with full marriage equality unambiguously applicable statewide.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
I think MO is the 1st where same-sex couples legally married, followed by KS, and then, depending on how you analyze it, SC on Wed already.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
But, there have been questions about the scope of state or federal court orders and/or there have been state v. federal court questions.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
In sum: The claim to being marriage equality state 33, 34, 35, or 36 (&, pending MS hearing outcome, possibly 37) is open to debate.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner It's pretty unambiguous in Montana. Missouri is unique but understandable. SC, we'll have to wait and see. KS is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TylerDinucci
@nuccbko I hope you saw the whole thread here, where I, basically, said all of that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner I now see that and now feel the silliest.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner I would define MO as first, tbh. It's not statewide, but unambiguous. Kansas will certainly be a chapter in the book, though.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@nuccbko I mean, MO is only first in a list about the first of these states to have *any* unambiguously authorized s-s couples' marriages.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.