So, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, and South Carolina all are states with marriage equality in some sense -- but rank ordering them is unclear.
-
-
In sum: The claim to being marriage equality state 33, 34, 35, or 36 (&, pending MS hearing outcome, possibly 37) is open to debate.
-
@chrisgeidner It's pretty unambiguous in Montana. Missouri is unique but understandable. SC, we'll have to wait and see. KS is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -
@nuccbko I hope you saw the whole thread here, where I, basically, said all of that.
-
@chrisgeidner I now see that and now feel the silliest. -
@nuccbko It happens to the best of us. ;-)
-
@chrisgeidner I would define MO as first, tbh. It's not statewide, but unambiguous. Kansas will certainly be a chapter in the book, though. -
@nuccbko I mean, MO is only first in a list about the first of these states to have *any* unambiguously authorized s-s couples' marriages.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner Charleston SC issued a bunch of licenses about a month ago, if I'm not mistaken, but it was just one clerk. -
@SallyAlbright I forgot about that! Whatever happened to them? *marks down note for tomorrow* -
@chrisgeidner Yes, to the Googles! I'm pretty sure it was the day the Virginia decision led to North Carolina. It was just some guy... -
@SallyAlbright Yeah. I recall that now, but, for some reason, I never counted them in my head. Sorta like the rogue Colorado clerk.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.