#PuertoRico federal judge upholds marriage banhttp://bit.ly/1wsXpPB
-
-
P.R. fed judge: "The petitioners in Baker v. Nelson were two men who had been denied a license to marry each other."
-
@chrisgeidner Judge Pérez Giménez is a senior judge and his opinion is well written although I disagree with it. -
@MUDDLAW Not sure I agree with you, but, OK. -
@chrisgeidner I read it and it is solid. No Supreme Court precedent. As I said, I don’t agree with it. -
@MUDDLAW I completely disagree w your assessment. -
@chrisgeidner That is your right, but undoubtedly Baker has not been overturned and there is no specific statement by SCOTUS yet on >
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The decision is based mostly on Baker, and will be reversed. There is some lunatic ranting at the end.
@chrisgeidner@AppellateDaily@EQCF -
@espinsegall@chrisgeidner@AppellateDaily@EQCF Jeebus, no kidding. Also citing Alito's dissent as affirmative authority is....bizarre - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner@EQCF no one talks about these territorial areas and there you go ... how will Virgin Islands rule? -
@chrisgeidner@EQCF opinion spends much of its time on Baker then shows its hand making the first 2/3 look like a fig leaf. Disappointing
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner@EQCF Not quite sure why Baker has enough precedent for not being heard while all the recent cases + Windsor don't.#sad#failThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.